11 ms·
why are you rebasing a branch that has tags? in my opinion (the one where i don't care what anyone else thinks kind) you shouldn't be using tags on your workin
by airtonix 4y ago
why are you rebasing a branch that has tags?
in my opinion (the one where i don't care what anyone else thinks kind) you shouldn't be using tags on your working branches and your mainline/release branches should only be the ones where tags exists.
This then means that the only place you should be rebasing is your working/feature/pr branches and that when you merge your working/feature/pr branch, it should get squashed into the target branch... No one cares about your fifty gazillion 'wip' commits.
- bornfreddy 4y agoI was responding to GPs idea to "name" commits with tags, so you've taken my comment out of context.
- chrisdirkis 4y agoI guess that's the parent's annoyance. It'd be nice to be able to use something like tags or labels for other things than releases, but since they're commit referents, they're pretty much only useful for releases and nothing else.