8 ms·

SOPA and the people who wrote it don't give a shit about creative people making more money out of it. This is all a move organized by the agencies, corporations

SOPA and the people who wrote it don't give a shit about creative people making more money out of it. This is all a move organized by the agencies, corporations, etc. who used to be essential for every creative to market himself and reach his target audience. The internet made them more or less obsolete and now they're fighting against it. There are numerous examples of "creative people" making good money out of their work on the internet, without worrying about piracy too much.

amichail 15y ago
Regardless of the motivation, one might expect that iOS developers for example would make more money with SOPA.
- algorithms 15y ago
  could you elaborate on that thought a bit?
  - nitrogen 15y ago
    OT/Meta: comments that consist solely of "Could you elaborate" or "Please explain" without quoting from and referring to the original idea may be perceived as a lazy way of pretending to engage in the conversation, while placing the burden of actual communication entirely on the other party.
- anatari 15y ago
  With SOPA iOS app developers might be able to more easily target pirate sites that give away their applications and reduce piracy.
- weaksauce 15y ago
  How? with SOPA you are enabling the copyright holders to go after apple's entire distribution center because someone cloned tetris and the owners of tetris came after apple with an infringment claim. This takes down all of distribution not just the clone. Since the distribution is over the internet and name resolution is based on dns this is actually possible. unless apple changes it to be static IP addresses it would shut things down. (which would hurt scalability and end user experience because they couldn't load balance easily). Just think about this, your revenue as an iOS dev could be culled because someone in the app store ecosystem infringed. How is that a good way to combat piracy? The pirates are going to pirate no matter what road block you set up.
  - jiggy2011 15y ago
    The thing with this is I just can't imagine the App store getting shut down because of this, or even youtube. There would be a serious uproar if that happened, people wouldn't stand for it. More likely is that some pirate sites will die and others will just go deeper underground. The people who are likely to be scared into shutting up shop all together will be smaller distributors of independent or amateur content. I would be saddened if the Internet became like the high street circa 1996 with a few large companies and producers setting the agenda for what we will watch and listen to.
    - timwiseman 15y ago
      The thing with this is I just can't imagine the App store getting shut down because of this, or even youtube. Those two are so well known and have so many lawyers at the ready they would be safe. But, there are plenty of smaller, legitimate services and sites that would be shut down because of SOPA.
    - nitrogen 15y ago
      The people who are likely to be scared into shutting up shop all together will be smaller distributors of independent or amateur content. I would be saddened if the Internet became like the high street circa 1996 with a few large companies and producers setting the agenda for what we will watch and listen to. That's exactly what we have to worry about, and exactly what old-school content providers have been fighting for ever since the Internet was created. We use YouTube and the App Store as examples that appeal to the common person's awareness of the Internet, but we have to be far more concerned about the effects of SOPA/PIPA/etc. on the next YouTube.
    - zacharycohn 15y ago
      Okay, maybe they wouldn't take down Youtube. But the chances of someone uploading a copyrighted video to Justin.tv? Or a thousand other small video hosting sites? Very high. Right now, someone files a notice, and Justin.tv says "oh crap! Lets take that down." and they do and everyone is happy. In the future, someone might file a notice, and then Justin Kan shows up at work one day and finds that his entire business has been taken offline by the government.
- barrkel 15y ago
  I wouldn't expect that at all. Can you explain why you think that? And even if that were true, it's not automatically a good thing. iOS developers might end up better off through eating into consumer surplus, rather than creating more aggregate value.
deleted 15y ago
[deleted]

amichail 15y ago

Regardless of the motivation, one might expect that iOS developers for example would make more money with SOPA.

algorithms 15y ago
could you elaborate on that thought a bit?
- nitrogen 15y ago
  OT/Meta: comments that consist solely of "Could you elaborate" or "Please explain" without quoting from and referring to the original idea may be perceived as a lazy way of pretending to engage in the conversation, while placing the burden of actual communication entirely on the other party.
anatari 15y ago
With SOPA iOS app developers might be able to more easily target pirate sites that give away their applications and reduce piracy.
weaksauce 15y ago
How? with SOPA you are enabling the copyright holders to go after apple's entire distribution center because someone cloned tetris and the owners of tetris came after apple with an infringment claim. This takes down all of distribution not just the clone. Since the distribution is over the internet and name resolution is based on dns this is actually possible. unless apple changes it to be static IP addresses it would shut things down. (which would hurt scalability and end user experience because they couldn't load balance easily). Just think about this, your revenue as an iOS dev could be culled because someone in the app store ecosystem infringed. How is that a good way to combat piracy? The pirates are going to pirate no matter what road block you set up.
- jiggy2011 15y ago
  The thing with this is I just can't imagine the App store getting shut down because of this, or even youtube. There would be a serious uproar if that happened, people wouldn't stand for it. More likely is that some pirate sites will die and others will just go deeper underground. The people who are likely to be scared into shutting up shop all together will be smaller distributors of independent or amateur content. I would be saddened if the Internet became like the high street circa 1996 with a few large companies and producers setting the agenda for what we will watch and listen to.
  - timwiseman 15y ago
    The thing with this is I just can't imagine the App store getting shut down because of this, or even youtube. Those two are so well known and have so many lawyers at the ready they would be safe. But, there are plenty of smaller, legitimate services and sites that would be shut down because of SOPA.
  - nitrogen 15y ago
    The people who are likely to be scared into shutting up shop all together will be smaller distributors of independent or amateur content. I would be saddened if the Internet became like the high street circa 1996 with a few large companies and producers setting the agenda for what we will watch and listen to. That's exactly what we have to worry about, and exactly what old-school content providers have been fighting for ever since the Internet was created. We use YouTube and the App Store as examples that appeal to the common person's awareness of the Internet, but we have to be far more concerned about the effects of SOPA/PIPA/etc. on the next YouTube.
  - zacharycohn 15y ago
    Okay, maybe they wouldn't take down Youtube. But the chances of someone uploading a copyrighted video to Justin.tv? Or a thousand other small video hosting sites? Very high. Right now, someone files a notice, and Justin.tv says "oh crap! Lets take that down." and they do and everyone is happy. In the future, someone might file a notice, and then Justin Kan shows up at work one day and finds that his entire business has been taken offline by the government.
barrkel 15y ago
I wouldn't expect that at all. Can you explain why you think that? And even if that were true, it's not automatically a good thing. iOS developers might end up better off through eating into consumer surplus, rather than creating more aggregate value.

deleted 15y ago

[deleted]