6 ms·
sure it's faster.. but go gin and fiber are really slow. they are literally 90% slower than the fast go frameworks. Not that im a go fanboy, but to put things i
by ki_ 4y ago
sure it's faster.. but go gin and fiber are really slow. they are literally 90% slower than the fast go frameworks. Not that im a go fanboy, but to put things into context here, the actual context here is: python framework 5% faster than fiber and 85% slower than gnet/silverlining/gearbox.
- cirospaciari 4y agoFor sure have room to improve but is very competitive, i will try to archive the 7 mi inthe future, this is a very young framework, i will work harder! https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=test&runid=124fd2af-3030-4315-8876-e1db1fa91193&test=plaintext&l=hr9nun-35r https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=test&runid=1...
- ki_ 4y agohuh? waw. strange. there are 2 fibers on the benchmarks. 1 slow and 1 really fast. Same for socketify. 1 fast, 1 slow. Why is this?
- cirospaciari 4y agoone uses pre-fork the other do not use pre-fork
- cirospaciari 4y agoin the case of socketify is CPython and PyPy running the same code, but both are really fast, in the case of fiber is without prefork and with prefork variants.
- ulimn 4y agoHow is fiber slow? Can you please provide some source? According to the techempower fortune branchmark, it's the 3rd (prefork) and 6th (normal) fastest go framework and even in the all-language list it's 24th and 34th.