6 ms·
I am not as comfortable having a back and forth on substack than I am on HN. I am not sure as to why people who use tools like [1], [2], [3], [4] have to declar
by wakana 4y ago
I am not as comfortable having a back and forth on substack than I am on HN. I am not sure as to why people who use tools like [1], [2], [3], [4] have to declare as such that the parts of the content may have been edited with help from computer tools if the end goal of conveying the information has been satisfactorily achieved. This seems like a rehashing of the "AI generated art is not real art" debate [5] again.
[1] https://huggingface.co/EleutherAI/gpt-j-6B https://huggingface.co/EleutherAI/gpt-j-6B
[2] https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/model_doc/bloom https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/model_doc/bloom
[3] https://www.jasper.ai/ https://www.jasper.ai/
[4] https://openai.com/api/ https://openai.com/api/
[5] https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/02/technology/ai-artificial-intelligence-artists.html https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/02/technology/ai-artificial-...
- NetOpWibby 4y agoWe're on HN now. Why have you deleted every comment on your post mentioning GPT-3? There were at least 4 or 5 comments mentioning it and you've deleted every one.
- wakana 4y agoI mentioned, I am not as comfortable having a back and forth on substack than I am on HN. That is why I deleted the comments on substack, as they were not relevant to LLMs (or "GPT-3" as you like to call them)
- NetOpWibby 4y ago> as you like to call them Just using the same language as the deleted comments.
- ops 4y agoNot sure about the others, but for [4], it's in their ToS: https://openai.com/api/policies/sharing-publication/#content-co-authored-with-the-openai-api-policy https://openai.com/api/policies/sharing-publication/#content...