7 ms·
The statement is "[4chan] is linked to massacres". This is simply a statement of fact, and it doesn't mean NYT isn't. (I'll be the first to call the NYT a rag,
by ancapsfascists 4y ago
The statement is "[4chan] is linked to massacres". This is simply a statement of fact, and it doesn't mean NYT isn't.
(I'll be the first to call the NYT a rag, as a leftist, but it's factually correct to say 4chan is linked with massacres.)
- _v7gu 4y agoThat’s why I said stones instead of lies. I’m ESL, but I believe that phrase relates to hypocrisy rather than slander.
- ancapsfascists 4y agoYou used the expression correctly, but it often implies, "... and therefore the criticism is invalid." E.g., NYT shouldn't level this criticism because it could also be subject to the criticism. Hard to tell with a written forum post.