6 ms·

>Because it was a dubiously sourced story Fake news. >You can see how that might be something a platform would want to suppress, not because they’re Democrat

>Because it was a dubiously sourced story Fake news. >You can see how that might be something a platform would want to suppress, not because they’re Democrat sleeper agents They suppressed it because they were very awake Democrat agents. >but because they don’t wanna be responsible for swaying the election because of fake news. No they wanted to deliberately sway the election, because of their partisan alliance. You can read the story here: Part 1: Matt Taibbi: https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1598822959866683394 https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1598822959866683394 Part 2: Bari Weiss: https://twitter.com/bariweiss/status/1601007575633305600 https://twitter.com/bariweiss/status/1601007575633305600 Part 3: Matt Taibbi: https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1601352083617505281 https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1601352083617505281 Part 4: Michael Shellenberger: https://twitter.com/shellenbergermd/status/1601720455005511680 https://twitter.com/shellenbergermd/status/16017204550055116... Part 5: Bari Weiss: https://twitter.com/bariweiss/status/1602364197194432515 https://twitter.com/bariweiss/status/1602364197194432515

mcv 4y ago
> >Because it was a dubiously sourced story > Fake news. Same thing. But the Hunter Biden laptop story was not only fake news, it was completely irrelevant, because Hunter Biden wasn't running for office, and unlike Trump's children, Biden's children don't work for him. And yet the fake story was leveraged by political operatives to sway the election. After all the issues of fake news swaying the 2016 election, Twitter decided the responsible thing to do for them was not to be complicit in spreading fake news this time.
- NaturalPhallacy 4y ago
  The part it contained about "10% for the big guy" (Joe Biden) was 100% newsworthy. It wasn't fake news and deep down all the downvoters know it. Suppressing it when it was known to be true was also a story. >Twitter decided the responsible thing to do for them was not to be complicit in spreading fake news this time. Actually they were at the forefront of spreading fake news as three actual journalists disclosed. Did you not even read the coverage? Because it sounds like you didn't. I even provided links to all of it above. Let me know after reading it if your views have changed.
  - mcv 4y ago
    They probably tried to mitigate the worst of the fake news. It's pretty hard to stop all fake news these days. Most news about Hunter Biden seems to be coming mostly from tabloids with a questionable relationship with the truth, and a political axe to grind. Even Fox News, a station known for its flexibility in what they call truth, passed on the story due to credibility concerns. As far as I can tell, there's no convincing evidence that any of those questionable emails are authentic, and although a few of the emails do seem to be authentic, it's not clear that the hard disk itself is, and there's plenty of evidence that that hard disk has been messed with and has lots of content planted on it by others. So everything about this smells like a dirty political hit job that even half of the Murdoch empire doesn't want anything to do with. And even if there is something here, it still pales in comparison to the corruption that Trump and his kids are still getting away with. Everything about this smells like a dirty political witch hunt based on made up or strongly manipulated "evidence".

mcv 4y ago

> >Because it was a dubiously sourced story > Fake news. Same thing. But the Hunter Biden laptop story was not only fake news, it was completely irrelevant, because Hunter Biden wasn't running for office, and unlike Trump's children, Biden's children don't work for him. And yet the fake story was leveraged by political operatives to sway the election. After all the issues of fake news swaying the 2016 election, Twitter decided the responsible thing to do for them was not to be complicit in spreading fake news this time.

NaturalPhallacy 4y ago
The part it contained about "10% for the big guy" (Joe Biden) was 100% newsworthy. It wasn't fake news and deep down all the downvoters know it. Suppressing it when it was known to be true was also a story. >Twitter decided the responsible thing to do for them was not to be complicit in spreading fake news this time. Actually they were at the forefront of spreading fake news as three actual journalists disclosed. Did you not even read the coverage? Because it sounds like you didn't. I even provided links to all of it above. Let me know after reading it if your views have changed.
- mcv 4y ago
  They probably tried to mitigate the worst of the fake news. It's pretty hard to stop all fake news these days. Most news about Hunter Biden seems to be coming mostly from tabloids with a questionable relationship with the truth, and a political axe to grind. Even Fox News, a station known for its flexibility in what they call truth, passed on the story due to credibility concerns. As far as I can tell, there's no convincing evidence that any of those questionable emails are authentic, and although a few of the emails do seem to be authentic, it's not clear that the hard disk itself is, and there's plenty of evidence that that hard disk has been messed with and has lots of content planted on it by others. So everything about this smells like a dirty political hit job that even half of the Murdoch empire doesn't want anything to do with. And even if there is something here, it still pales in comparison to the corruption that Trump and his kids are still getting away with. Everything about this smells like a dirty political witch hunt based on made up or strongly manipulated "evidence".