12 ms·

Medium has been the villain for quite some time now. But not so fast about Substack... they recently started showing modals. In the end, running a website cos

by lzauz 4y ago

Medium has been the villain for quite some time now. But not so fast about Substack... they recently started showing modals. In the end, running a website costs money. What are you going to do.

canadianfella 4y ago
donatj 4y ago
For what it’s worth I find their modals relatively unobtrusive and easily dismissed. It’s not great but like you said, they need to make a living.
thinkmcfly 4y ago
Switch platforms before investors can make their money back. Everyone wins!
thinkingemote 4y ago
Are the modals opt in or configurable by the author?
cpcallen 4y ago
Substack also gets lots of revenue from subscriptions. If that's not enough to keep the platform up then perhaps they need to try to take a bigger cut (or not offer service to authors who have too few subscribers). There's no reason for authors (who are Substack's customers) to want to make the platform more annoying for readers (some of whom are the author's customers). If the author is not making enough money (perhaps because Substack has started taking a bigger cut to cover costs) they need only to improve their writing and/or put more of it behind the paywall in order to get more subscribers.
imglorp 4y ago
Those modals are infuriating. Every time you go to SS for a different article, it will nag you. Does anyone have a uBlock rule to drop them all?
- dredmorbius 4y ago
  I'm using this in Stylish, a CSS manager browser extension: /* Substack modals, nags, etc. */ [class*="frontend-components-SubscribePrompt"] { display: none; } Saved as "Substack" and applied to any page/domain which uses Substack. Otherwise, for UBO, these two should work: ###.frontend-components-SubscribePrompt-module__subscribeDialog--2_6UY.frontend-pencraft-FlexBox-module__flex-align-center--21WCV.frontend-pencraft-FlexBox-module__flex-direction-column--2sph3.frontend-pencraft-FlexBox-module__flex--fK-9V ###.frontend-components-SubscribePrompt-module__background--2DQPj I suspect Substack vary their element names (e.g., the "2_6UY" and "2DQPj" strings in the above list), so that substring matches as I've used in my CSS example should be more robust. UBO uses the Easylist blocking syntax which ... I can't seem to find documented, so I'm guessing as to the specific patterns. Corrections/clues welcomed.

by lzauz 4y ago

Medium has been the villain for quite some time now. But not so fast about Substack... they recently started showing modals. In the end, running a website costs money. What are you going to do.

canadianfella 4y ago

donatj 4y ago

For what it’s worth I find their modals relatively unobtrusive and easily dismissed. It’s not great but like you said, they need to make a living.

thinkmcfly 4y ago

Switch platforms before investors can make their money back. Everyone wins!

thinkingemote 4y ago

Are the modals opt in or configurable by the author?

cpcallen 4y ago

Substack also gets lots of revenue from subscriptions. If that's not enough to keep the platform up then perhaps they need to try to take a bigger cut (or not offer service to authors who have too few subscribers). There's no reason for authors (who are Substack's customers) to want to make the platform more annoying for readers (some of whom are the author's customers). If the author is not making enough money (perhaps because Substack has started taking a bigger cut to cover costs) they need only to improve their writing and/or put more of it behind the paywall in order to get more subscribers.

imglorp 4y ago

Those modals are infuriating. Every time you go to SS for a different article, it will nag you. Does anyone have a uBlock rule to drop them all?

dredmorbius 4y ago
I'm using this in Stylish, a CSS manager browser extension: /* Substack modals, nags, etc. */ [class*="frontend-components-SubscribePrompt"] { display: none; } Saved as "Substack" and applied to any page/domain which uses Substack. Otherwise, for UBO, these two should work: ###.frontend-components-SubscribePrompt-module__subscribeDialog--2_6UY.frontend-pencraft-FlexBox-module__flex-align-center--21WCV.frontend-pencraft-FlexBox-module__flex-direction-column--2sph3.frontend-pencraft-FlexBox-module__flex--fK-9V ###.frontend-components-SubscribePrompt-module__background--2DQPj I suspect Substack vary their element names (e.g., the "2_6UY" and "2DQPj" strings in the above list), so that substring matches as I've used in my CSS example should be more robust. UBO uses the Easylist blocking syntax which ... I can't seem to find documented, so I'm guessing as to the specific patterns. Corrections/clues welcomed.