6 ms·
...is perhaps the hundred and fiftieth time I have read this (or a similar variant) nonsense of false analogy, already debunked explained and reexplained in hun
by __void 4y ago
...is perhaps the hundred and fiftieth time I have read this (or a similar variant) nonsense of false analogy, already debunked explained and reexplained in hundreds of variants
I am beginning to think that the people who parrot it are not even interested in its response (already said and reiterated hundreds of times in the last 12 hours)
- imgabe 4y agoDebunked how? I have not seen it before. Welcome to the open Internet, where millions of people may independently arrive at similar conclusions. Is this your first time here?
- infinitezest 4y agoRight? I'm actually interested in hearing the counter argument but unfortunately, it wasn't provided.
- TheLoafOfBread 4y agoYellow Pages - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellow_pages https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellow_pages
- salawat 4y agohttps://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_directory https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_directory Or White Pages, the non-commercial version. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_directory https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_directory Who lives where, and their telephone number has always been public record. It only started to become a real problem once people started automating telephone spam. Once again, an example of how Sales/Marketing/Advertising ruins every attempt at implementing a well formed public network.
- base698 4y agoNPC meme is real.
- xdennis 4y agoWould it hurt to link then?
- __void 4y agolink? is literally the first line and the first link in the post above > Worth remembering this is public information: https://globe.adsbexchange.com/?icao=a835af https://globe.adsbexchange.com/?icao=a835af
- lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 4y agoThey said: > If you own a home, your address may also be publicly available via county records. You responded: > ...is perhaps the hundred and fiftieth time I have read this (or a similar variant) nonsense of false analogy, already debunked explained and reexplained in hundreds of variants Someone asked for a link to any of those comments: > Would it hurt to link then? And you reference the start of this thread, which is the thing being questioned. Your comments in this thread have been uncritical. Anyway, I want to get it back on track if you're willing: > I'm actually interested in hearing the counter argument.
- imgabe 4y agoThere is no counter argument. This person was assigned their opinions by their chosen Internet tribe and has nothing to offer but feigned incredulity that anyone could possibly think differently than they do. 100% bluster, 0% substance.
- lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 4y agoReading through this thread, it's hard to disagree with your conclusion. I still believe these comments are made in good faith (read: these things are actually believed) and that's why I point out the lack of a coherent argument. I'd at least like to extend an olive branch for a more productive discussion.
- nonethewiser 4y ago> already debunked explained and reexplained in hundreds of variants Appeal to authority isnt a convincing argument. But if you're going to do it, you need to at least reference what you're appealing to.