> I'd argue that things like msyscall and mstack don't at all because they cost attackers only a couple of minutes of time once to develop a bypass technique (i

> I'd argue that things like msyscall and mstack don't at all because they cost attackers only a couple of minutes of time once to develop a bypass technique (ie move the stack pointer before a syscall, reuse the authorized syscall instruction) that they can apply everywhere. If you read up on library order randomization/re-link and retguard, you may find your technique won't be so reusable, even once you do manage to locate a syscall stub in libc.