5 ms·
Sure, but an embedded database is still simpler than client/server. For many tasks, postgres does not offer any meaningful benefit over sqlite so why add the co
by aiwv 4y ago
Sure, but an embedded database is still simpler than client/server. For many tasks, postgres does not offer any meaningful benefit over sqlite so why add the complexity?
- antifa 4y agoI've never worked on such a project that didn't benefit from postgres, but if I did, I would still use postgres because upgrading from sqlite to postgres, and learning a second SQL dialect, and converting a SQL between dialects sounds like a useless nightmare that costs me nothing to avoid.
- CoolCold 4y agoI feel it's modern hype on lonely/indie/solo developer creating new thing which changes the world. Not caring on "complex" things till the project reaches 1 request per minute and finally have some data to be lost, is totally fine with this goal/scale.