5 ms·

Meanwhile there are countless games from AAAs to indies that are Steam or Epic Games exclusives but I guess that's also okay for whatever reason. Just because I

by bdz 4y ago

Meanwhile there are countless games from AAAs to indies that are Steam or Epic Games exclusives but I guess that's also okay for whatever reason. Just because I can install multiple stores on my PC that doesn't make it better when it's locked in to one store.

criddell 4y ago
If the current situation sucks then doesn't it makes sense to block moves that would make it suck even more?
traverseda 4y ago
Doesn't it? Why not?
miiiiiike 4y ago
I won't play Epic exclusive games. Valve put so much effort into Linux as a platform that they've bought my loyalty. When I see a game go from a Steam pre-order Epic exclusive it basically disappears from my RADAR.
- _carbyau_ 4y ago
  I recall Mechwarrior 5 suffering that fate. Pre-orders on Steam turned into Epic exclusive caused an uproar. It came out on Steam a year later and I waited another year after that, then waited for a sale. And got a patched, polished game with mods - fun for co-op with friends. I don't think my "protest delayed" purchase 2+ years later made an impact on them. But it sated me.
  - miiiiiike 4y ago
    Whatever. At lease Epic didn't make anything. There's a bug difference between getting an exclusive or a timed exclusive because you partially funded a studio over just dumping buckets of money on a game that's basically done to make sure it doesn't end up on Steam for a year. I don't want to reboot or mess with other emulators. Steam works on Linux. Let me buy your game on Steam.
erik 4y ago
Valve doesn't really do "exclusives" with Steam the way other platforms have exclusives. If a game is only available on Steam, it's not because their was a contract signed or money paid to enforce that. It's because the developer or publisher has decided not to make the game available elsewhere for their own reasons.
- deleted 4y ago
  [deleted]
ThatPlayer 4y ago
Because as the FTC will tell you, exclusives are generally good for competition except for a few circumstances with monopolist companies. They clearly think Microsoft owning Activision would be one of those circumstances. https://www.ftc.gov/tips-advice/competition-guidance/guide-antitrust-laws/single-firm-conduct/exclusive-supply-or https://www.ftc.gov/tips-advice/competition-guidance/guide-a...

by bdz 4y ago

criddell 4y ago

If the current situation sucks then doesn't it makes sense to block moves that would make it suck even more?

traverseda 4y ago

Doesn't it? Why not?

miiiiiike 4y ago

I won't play Epic exclusive games. Valve put so much effort into Linux as a platform that they've bought my loyalty. When I see a game go from a Steam pre-order Epic exclusive it basically disappears from my RADAR.

_carbyau_ 4y ago
I recall Mechwarrior 5 suffering that fate. Pre-orders on Steam turned into Epic exclusive caused an uproar. It came out on Steam a year later and I waited another year after that, then waited for a sale. And got a patched, polished game with mods - fun for co-op with friends. I don't think my "protest delayed" purchase 2+ years later made an impact on them. But it sated me.
- miiiiiike 4y ago
  Whatever. At lease Epic didn't make anything. There's a bug difference between getting an exclusive or a timed exclusive because you partially funded a studio over just dumping buckets of money on a game that's basically done to make sure it doesn't end up on Steam for a year. I don't want to reboot or mess with other emulators. Steam works on Linux. Let me buy your game on Steam.

erik 4y ago

Valve doesn't really do "exclusives" with Steam the way other platforms have exclusives. If a game is only available on Steam, it's not because their was a contract signed or money paid to enforce that. It's because the developer or publisher has decided not to make the game available elsewhere for their own reasons.

deleted 4y ago
[deleted]

ThatPlayer 4y ago

Because as the FTC will tell you, exclusives are generally good for competition except for a few circumstances with monopolist companies. They clearly think Microsoft owning Activision would be one of those circumstances. https://www.ftc.gov/tips-advice/competition-guidance/guide-antitrust-laws/single-firm-conduct/exclusive-supply-or https://www.ftc.gov/tips-advice/competition-guidance/guide-a...