20 ms·
Appreciating F-Droid as an app developer
- fattybob 4y agoI love f droid and wish there was some way that all those apps could get links for iOS too (an iOS index?) - given an option I go for f droid and any iOS equivalent available always
- rakoo 4y agoWhat's the f-droid equivalent on iOS ?
- 2Gkashmiri 4y agoi would say if aurorastore people made an IOS version that does clean UI/ no ads and filter by "no ads" that would be a killer. i recently saw iPad that a friend bought and the app store, safari, apps are ad ridden shitfest like in pre-ublock days. i mean, internet surfing without ublock already feels like having unprotected sex and with everything else you can use adblocker but in apple, you are stuck.... yeah unless you use private DNS from some provider, they might help but not otherwise
- SyrupThinker 4y ago> i recently saw iPad that a friend bought and the app store, safari, apps are ad ridden shitfest like in pre-ublock days. This sounds ridiculous. The App Store complaint I can understand, you have the "Today" tab which is effectively advertisement. And the search is terrible, starting with one (clearly labeled) ad at the top and then "Collections" every few results. But the rest… > i mean, internet surfing without ublock already feels like having unprotected sex and with everything else you can use adblocker but in apple, you are stuck.... yeah unless you use private DNS from some provider, they might help but not otherwise I'm happy to inform you that one can in fact install ad blockers in Safari just fine [1] as well as set up system wide filters with locally running DNS. Basically, if I dare make the comparison, like on Android (although you have more choice there). One such example is Firefox Focus [2] which works quite well in my experience (note that it can integrate into Safari as a "Content Blocker"), but there are also payed options like AdGuard [3] (the "Pro" version is a one time purchase). So I don't think it's Apple's fault that your friend didn't do that. Unless one is of the opinion that they should be shipping one by default. And regarding apps, there tends to always be the option of not using an app or getting/buying one without ads. Again I don't think Apple is to blame for user choice as long as the ads aren't problematic themselves. For example none of the apps I use have ads in them, but I also payed for quite a few. [1]: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/safariservices/creating_a_content_blocker https://developer.apple.com/documentation/safariservices/cre... [2]: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/products/focus-firefox/Focus-ios https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/products/focus-firefox/Foc... [3]: https://adguard.com/en/adguard-ios-pro/overview.html https://adguard.com/en/adguard-ios-pro/overview.html
- pwdisswordfish9 4y agoThe reasons for the absence are pretty self-explanatory. iOS itself is proprietary. First, someone would need to initiate a project to create a free software clone of iOS, like ReactOS re Windows or even GNU re UNIX. That's a worthwhile project in and of itself.
- Jyaif 4y ago> iOS itself is proprietary. That's not a reason at all.
- pwdisswordfish9 4y agoF-Droid is a free software catalogue.
- mfuzzey 4y agoThe OS itself being proprietary isn't a reason to not have sideloading or alternative stores. Windows is proprietary too yet you've always been able to download a .EXE from arbitary web sites.
- pwdisswordfish9 4y ago> isn't a reason to not have sideloading or alternative stores Who argued otherwise? On the topic of F-Droid in particular not being available for iOS, there _is_ a reason behind it.
- kramerger 4y agoFdroid is great, but their interface to developers could improve a bit. For example, a test system and an easier method to import projects would have been appreciated
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- beenBoutIT 4y agoIt's the biggest PITA I've ever encountered. Just getting an app added to F-droid is a ridiculous hurdle.
- worldsavior 4y agoFdroid security tho is bad.
- woojoo666 4y agoCare to elaborate? Has there been any instances of malware?
- worldsavior 4y agoThey follow bad practices. For example it takes them too long to update apps, with no appreciation to the update (meaning if there was a critical CVE ), and other. Look at this site[1], showing some reasons why google play store is preferred. [1] https://wonderfall.dev/fdroid-issues/ https://wonderfall.dev/fdroid-issues/
- vanous 4y ago>For example it takes them too long to update apps, with no appreciation to the update (meaning if there was a critical CVE ), and other. Fully agree, have some experiences. Friendly advice: treat Fdroid like any other development dependency and try to be in control rather than being dependent: run your own f-droid repo which people can add to their Fdroid app as a source.
- worldsavior 4y agoAgreed. Using GitHub is already a better option since it's eliminating another party (Fdroid).
- ajvs 4y agoSelf-hosting a F-Droid repo means users can easily get automatic updates, which is important for security.
- worldsavior 4y ago
- monetus 4y agoF droid has better discovery than the play store for apps that avoid monetizing their basic features, e.g. a QRcode scanner. Some criticisms about the release model are valid IMO, with it using a different dynamic of trust than the play store. There is no good replacement for f droid.
- cf100clunk 4y agoThere's an alternative frontend UX to F-Droid that might be of interest: https://f-droid.org/en/packages/com.aurora.adroid/ https://f-droid.org/en/packages/com.aurora.adroid/
- antifa 4y agoI was interested, but you still can't zoom in to screenshots.
- commoner 4y agoAurora Droid was great, but it hasn't been updated since March 2021. I prefer Neo Store: - Neo Store (GitHub): https://github.com/NeoApplications/Neo-Store https://github.com/NeoApplications/Neo-Store - Neo Store (F-Droid): https://f-droid.org/packages/com.machiav3lli.fdroid/ https://f-droid.org/packages/com.machiav3lli.fdroid/
- cf100clunk 4y agoThanks, I just replaced Aurora Droid with Neo Store.