7 ms·

I don't see any reason to use this over Deno.

• deleted 4y ago
  [deleted]
• philippz 4y ago
  https://medium.com/deno-the-complete-reference/hello-world-performance-bun-vs-deno-dbfff38c9102 https://medium.com/deno-the-complete-reference/hello-world-p...
  • deleted 4y ago
    [deleted]
  • CharlesW 4y ago
    FWIW this similarly-trivial "Hello world" benchmark shows Bun's lead at ~25% faster than Deno at the moment, which doesn't seem insurmountable. https://github.com/denosaurs/bench https://github.com/denosaurs/bench
    • panzerboiler 4y ago
      Those benchmarks are measuring the speed of the tool used to run the benchmark, not the http servers. Take them with a pack of salt.
      • CharlesW 4y ago
        "Take all benchmarks with a grain of salt" is my middle name, but the benchmark I linked to is an open source project with 17 contributors. In contrast, I'm not seeing any source referenced by the Medium benchmark article I responded to.
  • tested23 4y ago
    Doesnt deno bring a bunch of security improvements to the table?
• epolanski 4y ago
  Performance matters a lot.
  • culi 4y ago
    Well then... don't write your back end in javascript? The next most popular alternative is probably Ruby which has even worse performance. I don't disagree that performance matters but I don't think the industry seems to agree
    • deleted 4y ago
      [deleted]
• _hypx 4y ago
  The more options the better.