4 ms·
Sure it's a piece in a far right wing magazine with its own agenda to push, but you'll have to substantiate your claim of "complete bullshit". The Chinese gover
by Hontano 15y ago
Sure it's a piece in a far right wing magazine with its own agenda to push, but you'll have to substantiate your claim of "complete bullshit". The Chinese government is well known for its supression entire ethnicities.
But surely you'd agree having your organs cut out while you're still alive very much does matter, no? Or is it okay if it's done to particular kinds of people?
If any of the article is true it's horrific.
- twoodfin 15y agoThe Weekly Standard is only far right wing if you think the NYT is moderately right-of-center. You know where David Brooks used to write, yes?
- Hontano 15y agoDepends on what scope you're considering. You're right if you're talking about the US alone. But calling the NYT moderately right-of-center isn't far off the mark if you consider the wider Western media.
- barrkel 15y agoIn the global scheme of things, almost all US press is right-wing, NYT too.
- verroq 15y agoThe article didn't present any evidence of genocide. Only organ harvesting was substantiated.
- felipe 15y agoIt's "complete bullshit" because the Chinese government uses the same argument used by the US on the war on terror, yet no one accuses the US of genocide. Also, it's not the first time the Weekly Standard distorts the facts in favor of some right-wing agenda (the very war on terror being such an example) (like the OP, I'm not defending China's actions here. I'm simply pointing out the double-standard)