7 ms·
Agree with bokeh: This was taken with a Leica m9 using f0.95 50mm noctilux lens: https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlist.com-vbulletin/2000x1333/l1013508_a6482e0e
by farazbabar 4y ago
Agree with bokeh: This was taken with a Leica m9 using f0.95 50mm noctilux lens: https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlist.com-vbulletin/2000x1333/l1013508_a6482e0e192342cb909cad1b77396cefe8327b3f.jpg https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlist.com-vbulletin/2000x133...
- Joeri 4y agoThis was taken using an iphone 13 mini (not pro) in regular mode. https://share.icloud.com/photos/0dectlquUI6Ur6vDCWrYw6oHg https://share.icloud.com/photos/0dectlquUI6Ur6vDCWrYw6oHg Not so bad IMHO. Edit: this one is more pronounced, again not in portrait mode. https://share.icloud.com/photos/0c9pBN5Fy2yL0fuSYrX4j3BnA https://share.icloud.com/photos/0c9pBN5Fy2yL0fuSYrX4j3BnA
- mstaoru 4y agoBokeh is physics, for smaller objects it's easier to reach some DoF even with f/4-6. On the 1st example the bokeh is, subjectively, very far from the SLR level, displaying a lot of onion rings and generally busy texture. For portraiture and street photography fast primes will still produce much more pleasing results. For now. I agree that we are certainly getting somewhere with the phone cameras, but I'm not sure where the ceiling is.