> Not really. He's mouthed the words, of course, but it appears that his definition of "free speech" is "whatever Musk wants it to be". Pretty hard to nail thi

> Not really. He's mouthed the words, of course, but it appears that his definition of "free speech" is "whatever Musk wants it to be". Pretty hard to nail this perfectly if we are being honest. But Twitter allows more free speech now than before. > Not what he said. What he said is that he'll allow allow all speech that isn't illegal. He could decide to censor all speech from everyone on Twitter right now, and that wouldn't go beyond what is permissible by law. Not sure I understand your argument here. > Why? Advertisers don't have freedom of speech? They should be forced to engage in speech and do business with a company when they find it distasteful or potentially harmful to their business? Advertisers have freedom of speech. What they don't have now is the ability to coerce the Twitter platform into censoring other users' speech. Besides they are free to do business where their needs are best served. Twitter's not a monopoly.