6 ms·
https://medium.com/@worstonlinedater/tinder-experiments-ii-guys-unless-you-are-really-hot-you-are-probably-better-off-not-wasting-your-2ddf370a6e9a https://medi
by deltaseventhree 4y ago
https://medium.com/@worstonlinedater/tinder-experiments-ii-guys-unless-you-are-really-hot-you-are-probably-better-off-not-wasting-your-2ddf370a6e9a https://medium.com/@worstonlinedater/tinder-experiments-ii-g...
https://www.reddit.com/r/TrueAskReddit/comments/whpxuw/dating_app_statistics_show_than_women_are/ https://www.reddit.com/r/TrueAskReddit/comments/whpxuw/datin...
This study had an unrelated purpose but nevertheless extracted the same data.
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/magazines/panache/the-math-behind-dating-apps-women-like-only-4-out-of-100-profiles-men-more-likely-to-swipe-right/articleshow/75736043.cms?from=mdr https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/magazines/panache/the-m...
Everything I'm saying is common knowledge if you are an average (key word) man on dating apps OR if you're well versed in academic anthropology or evolutionary psychology (NOT gender studies). As an average male, we live this life anecdotally. The imbalance of power in the dating market invades every facet of what we feel and see. It is part of our logical reality. If you are not an average single man, it is very likely this reality is completely foreign to you; and when presented with this new angle you will likely not accept it.
Our culture paints a picture of inequality. The equation speaks to one side of of the story. The story of female empowerment; The rise of of the underdog. The other side of the equation, the male side, is invisible, especially if you are not a male.
The evidence extends beyond dating app statistics (which all categorically point to the same conclusion) to biology and anthropology:
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2014/sep/24/women-men-dna-human-gene-pool https://www.theguardian.com/science/2014/sep/24/women-men-dn...
The genetic diversity of female genes is greater than male genes.
https://slate.com/technology/2012/10/are-humans-monogamous-or-polygamous-the-evolution-of-human-mating-strategies.html https://slate.com/technology/2012/10/are-humans-monogamous-o...
In anthropology Monogamy is considered to be a mating strategy that guarantee a single mate for all men. It is advantageous to men and in many societies it is artificially enforced. Polygamy is more advantageous to females and the likely natural outcome when females are more empowered in society. It guarantees the best mate for females.
Of course women would prefer to be in a monogamous relationship with an alpha male. But given the choice between monogamy with a beta male or polygamy with an alpha they choose the later.
More on that here:
https://www.vice.com/en/article/a38dwj/monogamy-may-be-even-more-difficult-for-women-than-it-is-for-men https://www.vice.com/en/article/a38dwj/monogamy-may-be-even-...
Given anthropological studies of human culture and genetic studies of female genetic diversity, the conclusion is inescapable:
Hookup culture is the natural outcome of human behavior. Dating apps only magnify this behavior and allow us to collect data on it.