I am biased but I don't think it's fair to say that your article covers as much. There is more content in the article written in a way that's trying to be appro

I am biased but I don't think it's fair to say that your article covers as much. There is more content in the article written in a way that's trying to be approachable. I certainly will agree it's wordy but it's hard to make content that's interesting to a wide audience Your article does cover how to use/enable them while the post does not. But it's meant for part 2