5 ms·
Oh it is totally passive-aggressive coersion. The notion of "poor performers" is a sign of bad management. They bloat the company to where they can no longer g
by sbf501 4y ago
Oh it is totally passive-aggressive coersion.
The notion of "poor performers" is a sign of bad management. They bloat the company to where they can no longer get their billion dollar handouts, er, payouts, and then take it out on people who actually care about their jobs and claim they are "poor" at it. While scaring the shit out of everyone else.
I know there are going to be a bunch of bros who think, "Yeah, that's not me, I'm fucking Tony Stark," but in reality, part of their brain will noodle on this gaslighting whether they want it to or not. So it really affects everyone.
It is a sign of toxic rot in a culture when they start branding people this way. But it's Amazon, it's a synonym for toxic.
- sokoloff 4y ago> But it's Amazon, it's a synonym for toxic. You realize this article is about Google, right?
- sbf501 4y agoTo the three of you that told me this. You are correct, it is Google. Is there a difference? (Rhetorical)
- josteink 4y ago> But it's Amazon, it's a synonym for toxic. Eh. This article was about Google.
- akamaozu 4y agoCompany in question is Google, not Amazon.