7 ms·
Something different. I have been using Markdown Footnotes extension [1] and found its syntax to be natural to Markdown. Here's the same sample as OP in Markdow
by richsu-ca 4y ago
Something different. I have been using Markdown Footnotes extension [1] and found its syntax to be natural to Markdown.
Here's the same sample as OP in Markdown Footnotes syntax. There is a link to the rendered page [2].
https://gist.githubusercontent.com/richsuca/f5a14ed9cb76e7ad2f4f6b11361516f5/raw/2c41c8e14f6834a4a3e44f1846e26362ede38da4/Footnotes.md https://gist.githubusercontent.com/richsuca/f5a14ed9cb76e7ad...
[1] https://python-markdown.github.io/extensions/footnotes/ https://python-markdown.github.io/extensions/footnotes/
[2] https://gist.github.com/richsuca/f5a14ed9cb76e7ad2f4f6b11361516f5 https://gist.github.com/richsuca/f5a14ed9cb76e7ad2f4f6b11361...
- breck 4y agoThanks for the comparison! Really appreciate it. I think I'll copy some of the style from yours. I really like the smaller font size for the notes, the different font color, and in particular the link back to where the note was used! Double linked list, I love it! Stylistically I like the more minimal look of (the lack of brackets, and I think n may change link color to black): https://ab1908.github.io/2021/08/24/footnotes-in-web-content.html https://ab1908.github.io/2021/08/24/footnotes-in-web-content...