6 ms·
Its the part that you omitted from your summary that makes the statement nontrivial—the idea that the metric theory (poetically, the warping of space) is only v
by zachf 4y ago
Its the part that you omitted from your summary that makes the statement nontrivial—the idea that the metric theory (poetically, the warping of space) is only valid as a low energy effective description, and the general case does not have a classical interpretation even in a limit.
To put it another way: the quantum theories that are best understood are the ones that are similar to a classical field theory, but that’s not the case here.
- wrycoder 4y agoIt appears that when I eliminated inessential verbiage, what remained was a tautology.