18 ms·
Out of curiosity, does anyone know what happened to all of the Theranos hardware / technology after the company was shut down? e.g. the edison testing machines
by codex_irl 4y ago
Out of curiosity, does anyone know what happened to all of the Theranos hardware / technology after the company was shut down? e.g. the edison testing machines
- arthurcolle 4y agoWhat is the value of IP that doesn't work? Edison machine IP seems about as useful as those time travel or perpetual motion machine patents that come up.
- etaioinshrdlu 4y agoI would very much like a Theranos Edison for my office, next to a Juicero.
- jen20 4y agoI'd imagine those machines in particular would be useful as museum pieces.
- codex_irl 4y agoThat is what I am thinking.
- jliptzin 4y agoCollectibles…definitely a market there
- codex_irl 4y agoI don't think that the machine IP has much (any) value, more just curious what happened to them from an "oddity" viewpoint e.g. did they get thrown in a dumpster or is there some warehouse out there, packed with all the stuff they cleared out of the old Theranos HQ
- ghaff 4y agoPresumably there are liquidation companies that deal with such things. (There are companies out there to do pretty much anything.)
- duxup 4y agoThey had nothing of value. They were often running tests on competitors machines. They either passed those results off as coming from their machines, or validated their own results using competing machines. Their machine could not do what it promised with the amount of blood it claimed to use and was no better than proven machines, and arguably worse as they had lot of maintenance issues even operating at their HQ.
- hn_throwaway_99 4y agoAs the other's have said, Theranos technology had nothing of value. Not only did the technology not work, it is physically impossible for it to ever work - capillary blood is not homogeneous enough at that small of a volume to give accurate quantitative results. This is one of the things that made me a bit angry when reading some of the letters of support to Holmes today, and her own statement. That is, so much of it still carried on with the fantasy that "Holmes was close, but just fell short". No, she didn't fall short. Her own lust for recognition and power blinded her to the physical realities of what was possible, harming investors, employees and patients in the process. I'm actually a bit surprised at the outcome - 11 years seems like a fair and justified sentence for what she perpetrated.