6 ms·
> However, YouTube contains lots of uploaded songs and the US government could have seized their domain for a long time already, but didn't. Correct me if I'm
by msquared 15y ago
> However, YouTube contains lots of uploaded songs and the US government could have seized their domain for a long time already, but didn't.
Correct me if I'm wrong here, but isn't this what the DMCA safe harbor protection is for? They can't just pull their domain if they are responding in a timely manner to reasonable DMCA takedown requests.
Or am I missing a point you're making? Entirely possible. It's 4:55. I'm burnt out.
- EGreg 15y agoI think the point is that they are looking to give greater remedies than DMCA. You would now be able to complain about a website to those doing business with it, and they are supposed to stop doing business with it. If it's foreign, anyway.