7 ms·
Yes, so the politician is at least trying to understand and represent other people's views. They've made the decision to take the heat and are psychologically p
by origin_path 4y ago
Yes, so the politician is at least trying to understand and represent other people's views. They've made the decision to take the heat and are psychologically prepared for it.
Choosing people at random is not going to work well. Look at what happens with juries - lots of people find creative ways to get out of jury duty and that's for a way smaller commitment of time than a political term. The randomly chosen person won't want to be in government at all. Their life has just been totally up-ended through no fault of their own. Now no matter what they do, they're going to be wildly famous and wildly unpopular with huge segments of the population. All they wanted was to do their job and take care of their family, now they're getting harassed on the street by political enemies, having to go on TV, having to justify their decisions to journalists. Presumably some of the really unlucky ones will have to become ministers, but how do they even get picked?
No, the randomly chosen person has no reason to give a single damn about anything or anyone except themselves in that position. Heck half of them will be thinking: if I just refuse to turn up to work, maybe there'll be a recall and a new person will be randomly chosen.
Then take into account all the exceptions and justifiable reasons why people will be able to get out of this duty (e.g. because they're sick, because they're caregivers, because they're non-citizens, because they're mothers, because their company testifies that person is critical to their operations, etc). The ones you'll end up with are the ones who have nothing better to do. Expect the terminally unemployed to be over-represented.
- javajosh 4y agoSo, I actually responded purely about your narrow claim, and not about picking citizens at random. I don't really have an opinion about that. Although I would point out that right now we're selecting for a certain type of person who wants to win and can take heat and craft messaging and analyze options in terms of communications spending. But narcissism, more than anything, seems required. What else drives someone to become a politician? Precious few politicians seem like they were "called" to do that work, despite wanting a more humble, quieter life. Maybe someone like Jimmy Carter? I'd say its an intriguing idea, one worth trying on a more local scale, like for mayor or city counsel. See if things fall apart. If not, try at a higher scale, and repeat.
- origin_path 4y agoI think quite a lot of the politicians I've interacted with (in the UK) actually do seem to believe in public service. They certainly aren't all narcissists.