4 ms·

Didn't you meant to write: "you are good to go to pollute"

• no_time 4y ago
  • gambiting 4y ago
    It's always interesting when this is brought up, because private flights emissions are literally nothing compared to the transport industry emissions. They might as well be zero. Introduction of AdBlue has been one of the greatest improvements in diesel emissions that we have done - calling it "peddling by brussels" is uninformed at best and actively malicious at worst.
    • no_time 4y ago
      Demanding that our leaders follow the same lifestyle they are forcing on us is I think a very straightforward thing.
      • orwin 4y ago
        This has nothing to do with CO2 emissions and everything to do with particle pollution. Our leaders do not live inside urban centers, and do not suffer from particle pollution. Or at least way less than the average citizen, and i'm not even talking about the people living near the Paris ring road, who aren't exactly the richest. I understand if you're from the countryside (i am too) that you dislike adBlue, but think that it probably add years of living to the poorest urbanites.
      • gambiting 4y ago
        Of course - and they should. But the argument that you shouldn't be using AdBlue in your diesel because rich people fly private jets is frankly, crazy. Both things should be addressed, but one of those things is far more important to tackle right now for the health of everyone.