5 ms·
Closed source, so we can speculate (or try to reverse engineer/break it).
by tzmudzin 4y ago
Closed source, so we can speculate (or try to reverse engineer/break it).
- stalfosknight 4y agoSo at best we have cynicism / paranoia regarding Apple's T2.
- jeffbee 4y agoThat's all anyone has against IME, also. And BridgeOS isn't any more secure. There are tons of known flaws in it.
- stalfosknight 4y agoPart of it runs bridgeOS. The Secure Enclave runs something else altogether called sepOS. https://support.apple.com/guide/security/secure-enclave-sec59b0b31ff/web https://support.apple.com/guide/security/secure-enclave-sec5...
- anonym29 4y agoBy a 'zero trust' security philosophy, anything short of completely open source is inherently untrustable. You may not be practicing that philosophy, but that doesn't make those who do "paranoid" any more than corporations implementing PCI-DSS controls. Security does not work retroactively, only proactively.