The article isn't correct in all arguments: > However, you won’t be getting the advanced features like automation or other integration... Codeberg also has bu

The article isn't correct in all arguments: > However, you won’t be getting the advanced features like automation or other integration... Codeberg also has built-in CI support using Woodpecker (ci.codeberg.org). It works very well. > However, if you are interested in a privacy-friendly GitHub alternative from Europe, I suggest you check out Codeberg. Important to know that Codeberg only allows to host projects with a FLOSS license. So I wouldn't announce it as a GitHub alternative without a further note.