7 ms·

One side story. There is no comments / voice on the AA side. Read like a biased article. "become a must-have" reads like exaggeration

• blamazon 4y ago
  There are no comments/voice on the AA side because they are likely 'accidentally' dodging labor laws (by laying obligation of checking legality on the attendants) through obfuscation of this data. That seems a large part of why it's become a 'must-have.' That kind of behavior merits this relatively 'soft' one-sided take in my opinion.
• not2b 4y ago
  By that reasoning, if the company refuses to comment an article should not be published, or if published must be rejected as one sided? That's convenient.
  • gpvos 4y ago
    You can always still publish when they don't react within a reasonable time, and add a comment to that effect, as you can often see in newspaper articles.
    • not2b 4y ago
      From the article: "American Airlines has been contacted for comment." Evidently they did not respond.
      • gpvos 4y ago
        Ah, I overlooked that. But I would have searched for it before posting a comment like nnm's above.
• kashunstva 4y ago
  Then perhaps AA corporate should have responded more promptly to the writer’s request for information had they been interested in being more fairly represented.
• MattGaiser 4y ago
  > American Airlines has been contacted for comment. They have been asked for one.