7 ms·
The problem with that is, at least in my experience, that you read such things once from a reputable source and never check it again.
by MilanTodorovic 4y ago
The problem with that is, at least in my experience, that you read such things once from a reputable source and never check it again.
- 9wzYQbTYsAIc 4y agoWhen I was studying undergrad psych, Psychology Today was falling into disrepute. Are they still a reputable source, today?
- cosmojg 4y agoIsn't that one of those clickfarm blogs?
- jdkoeck 4y agoPsychology Today is not great in general, but the article I linked to is written by a social psychology PhD (Lee Jussim).
- 9wzYQbTYsAIc 4y agoOk, good to know, thanks! Setting this aside for a deeper read, but it appears at first glance that the concerns revolve around statistical technique rather than methodological soundness?
- lupire 4y agoIt can't be "still reputable" after "falling into disrepute".
- 9wzYQbTYsAIc 4y ago“was falling” in the imperfect tense.