5 ms·
It is a premature conclusion that Hans was cheating in this game. Let the proper process play out, whatever that may be. Magnus has not presented any actual e
by pcj-github 4y ago
It is a premature conclusion that Hans was cheating in this game. Let the proper process play out, whatever that may be. Magnus has not presented any actual evidence. Chess.com is not an impartial player here in this drama and cannot be considered source-of-truth (they just purchased Magnus' startup for ~$80M; their fortunes are linked and would be subject to similar biases). WSJ article has not really done a deep dive.
- ratg13 4y agoAs Magnus pointed out, the issue is more about how can you trust that a regular cheater is not cheating in a particular game if the regulators aren't doing enough to prevent it.