6 ms·
I may be mistaken but I believe that human/machine pairing was dominant for a long while, but the last few years the chess solvers have progressed to a point wh
by looknee 4y ago
I may be mistaken but I believe that human/machine pairing was dominant for a long while, but the last few years the chess solvers have progressed to a point where they're dominant on their own.
Poker on the other hand I think human players still win vs GTO solvers, but again I may be mistaken here too.
- lairv 4y agoI think AI now beat humans at poker https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/07/190711141343.htm https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/07/190711141343.h... https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~noamb/papers/19-Science-Superhuman.pdf https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~noamb/papers/19-Science-Superhuman.p...
- LarsDu88 4y agoIs there a single "intellectual" game left that humans can beat computers at? I suppose an AI has yet to beat lebron james at basketball, but I suppose that's for want of having a body.
- dwohnitmok 4y ago> Poker on the other hand I think human players still win vs GTO solvers, but again I may be mistaken here too. Also an outsider, but I think this has changed in the last year and that AI now is consistently better than top-tier humans at even no-limits poker.