5 ms·
And that's exactly what GP is trying to convey.
by eliseumds 4y ago
And that's exactly what GP is trying to convey.
- usefulcat 4y agoI've read GP comment three times now and I don't get that meaning at all. Either they did a really bad job, or (more likely) that's not what they were trying to convey.
- loupol 4y agoI personally understood GP comment as vindicating in favor of the law by implicitly trying to preempt those who might argue that this used to be (and should remain) private information. The counterargument it makes is that it isn't private and that the information asymmetry creates a power imbalance that would be curbed by this law. My interpretation may be wrong though, English is not my native language.
- hayst4ck 4y agoThis is what I was trying to convey.
- z9znz 4y agoAll that was missing was a first clause, "This is a good law because ..." :)
- konschubert 4y agoMaybe OP wanted to just present the facts that favour the law, but let the reader decide by themselves if it's good or bad.