8 ms·
Ah, that's good to know. Now, sadly, I must ask, is someone going to try to make this proprietary and embedded, contained within hermetically sealed hardware e
by 1010100101 15y ago
Ah, that's good to know.
Now, sadly, I must ask, is someone going to try to make this proprietary and embedded, contained within hermetically sealed hardware enclosures, complete with convoluted bootloader and behavioural studies rootkit, to try to make billions from it?
To my knowledge the low-level part can happen right now using freely available code. Is it naive to think we could keep this simple and open?
Even the p2p FB piece is possible, assuming you do not need to have 1000's of friends on each of your separate social networks.
- bobwaycott 15y agoNow, sadly, I must ask, is someone going to try to make this proprietary and embedded, contained within hermetically sealed hardware enclosures, complete with convoluted bootloader and behavioural studies rootkit, to try to make billions from it? If the problem is submitted to the market, then yes. That's what the market and capital does. So sad. It'd be great if the world's geeks would stop laboring for the fucking market, increasing the surplus value exacted from their labor, and winding up fucked by their own creations. EDIT: formatting
- 1010100101 15y ago"winding up fscked by their own creations" This would be easier to understand if you could provide an example. Do you think this is a problem that should be submitted to the market?