5 ms·
Looking forward to runnable code this time. Most of us are old enough by now to remember many project plans just like this one. Fool me once..
by crazytalk 4y ago
Looking forward to runnable code this time. Most of us are old enough by now to remember many project plans just like this one. Fool me once..
- Twirrim 4y agoThis project has already landed improvements in 3.10, and some much bigger improvements in 3.11. This work for 3.12 is "just" a continuation of that excellent effort: https://www.phoronix.com/review/python-311-benchmarks/4 https://www.phoronix.com/review/python-311-benchmarks/4
- nedbat 4y agoHave you followed the 3.11 performance improvements by the same group? It's ~25% faster than 3.10.
- est 4y agoHow does it compare to peak python2.x performance?
- NavinF 4y agopython2.x performance was surpassed long ago. I don't think anyone bothers to benchmark it anymore.
- mixmastamyk 4y agoAlready passed it with the 3.6 dict improvements iirc.
- jaimex2 4y agofaster at what?! That's a pretty generic statement and likely true only in a very specific frame.
- arcanemachiner 4y agohttps://www.phoronix.com/review/python-311-benchmarks/4 https://www.phoronix.com/review/python-311-benchmarks/4
- sanxiyn 4y ago25% number is from pyperformance benchmark suite, which you can replicate. Whether pyperformance is representative benchmark suite is another question. https://github.com/python/pyperformance https://github.com/python/pyperformance
- jaimex2 4y agoCheers. It rubs people the wrong way but I always call out blanket statements. Generally languages get faster with each version and theres a lot of numbers thrown around, it doesn't mean your apps will get anywhere near that boost. If you're lucky that one loop that concats strings got a few ms shaven off while that ORM youre using continues to grind the whole thing down.