6 ms·
Dojo has already lost the battle. I used it for awhile and it is a cool framework. However, Jquery has it beat in terms of documentation (code and usage) and
by rick888 15y ago
Dojo has already lost the battle.
I used it for awhile and it is a cool framework. However, Jquery has it beat in terms of documentation (code and usage) and community support (I can find pretty much any component I need with Jquery).
- mitchellhislop 15y agoYou should take another look at the link - its all about ROR and Sinatra, not Dojo Toolkit.
- rick888 15y agoHow does this invalidate my point? The link title includes "Dojo" and I was stating my opinion. I see the Dojo fanbois have downvoted me.
- bmelton 15y agoThe people who realize that this isn't Dojo, the JS framework, and is instead Dojo, the Ruby Deployment Tool... they're the ones who downvoted you.
- rick888 15y agowell, it's not my fault. It's the fault of the person that named a ruby development tool "Dojo" when it's clear there was already a javascript framework with the same name. so..maybe they should be downvoting themselves? (like I have your responses)
- bmelton 15y agoAn equally compelling argument could be made that it is the fault of whomever didn't bother to read the article.
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- dhaivatpandya 15y agoI think that's the shittiest argument I've ever seen. You didn't even open the link before just leaving a negative comment about it. It takes a lot of work to write web apps, and when people say negative things about them, it hurts.
- gumbo72 15y agohe doesn't mean Dojo as a framework
- rhizome 15y agoI would bet that you would have gotten a much different response if your comment indicated that you read the article at all, rather than constructing a post based entirely on your interpretation of the OP's (lame) title.