7 ms·
This is almost always the case, no matter the service we're talking about.
by zivkovicp 4y ago
This is almost always the case, no matter the service we're talking about.
- eddieroger 4y agoAlso, "pick what you know" applies here, too. If you know NGINX, then all you get from switching to Caddy is experience, and likewise, vice versa.
- mholt 4y ago*and memory safety* This cannot be understated. Caddy is not written in C! And it can even run your NGINX configs. :) https://github.com/caddyserver/nginx-adapter https://github.com/caddyserver/nginx-adapter
- excitom 4y agoA solution in search of a problem.
- 5d8767c68926 4y agoNginx security page [0] lists a non-zero amount of exploitable issues rooted in manual memory management. [0] https://nginx.org/en/security_advisories.html https://nginx.org/en/security_advisories.html
- no_time 4y agoIs this how we ended up with electron for desktop applications and Java for backend?
- philipwhiuk 4y agoYes, because developers and expensive and so developer productivity dominates almost everything else.