5 ms·
Because I'm talking about AI, not AGI. And because I'm observing the frontier of AI: https://twitter.com/AdeptAILabs/status/1570144499187453952 https://twitter
by rebelos 4y ago
Because I'm talking about AI, not AGI. And because I'm observing the frontier of AI:
https://twitter.com/AdeptAILabs/status/1570144499187453952 https://twitter.com/AdeptAILabs/status/1570144499187453952 https://twitter.com/runwayml/status/1568220303808991232 https://twitter.com/runwayml/status/1568220303808991232
https://scale.com/blog/text-universal-interface https://scale.com/blog/text-universal-interface
- goatlover 4y agoThat's a neat demo. Now explain how you know, "AI that will terraform society and rapidly displace human labor over the coming decades", to be true.
- rebelos 4y ago> Now explain how you know, "AI that will terraform society and rapidly displace human labor over the coming decades", to be true. Because I didn't say it will "obsolete" human labor. You're right that the word "will" is strong in that statement. But, since basically nothing is absolute in a philosophical sense and certainly no one can prognosticate with certainty, it's fair to read that as "will with high likelihood". And your surgical nitpicking doesn't hamper my argument in quite the way you think it does. Frankly, I believe it's in defiance of the following HN guideline: > Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith.