6 ms·
It just shows you can be an avid drug user and still make enormous contributions to STEM. It only takes n=1 to provide a counterexample to an absolute like "dr
by Judgmentality 4y ago
It just shows you can be an avid drug user and still make enormous contributions to STEM. It only takes n=1 to provide a counterexample to an absolute like "drugs never produce anything substantial."
- Brusco_RF 4y agoThat's quite the strawman, I don't know anyone who says that. And if they did I would ask them if they drank coffee or if they were aware that a good chunk of young professionals are on ADHD medication
- Judgmentality 4y ago> commitment to the material in that depth is not the product of drugs You think this is saying drugs sometimes lead to commitment? It sure reads like an absolute statement to me.
- Brusco_RF 4y agoYes that is an absolute statement (and maybe an incorrect one!) but it's scope is psychedelics in relation to GEB, not all possible drugs in all possible situations