9 ms·
Way downhill. The MSDN circa 1996-2000 (if that's what it was called, I don't recall) was excellent. Their C/C++/Win32 documentation was clear, helpful, and con
by garren 4y ago
Way downhill. The MSDN circa 1996-2000 (if that's what it was called, I don't recall) was excellent. Their C/C++/Win32 documentation was clear, helpful, and concise.
Then with the advent of .Net (or, at least, around that time, say 2000+) things just ballooned and suddenly the MSDN became super difficult to navigate, almost overnight. Even today, there's a lot (a lot) there but it's nowhere near as useful as is used to be. The MSDN habit of providing a TOC to the left of any given article seems like it /should/ be useful, but instead it's been beaten to death. There must be a better way to navigate their documentation than that.
Also, surprisingly often links to other documentation are broken - that's not new, it's always been the case iirc, but it's much more prevalent these days.
And, some of their stuff has a lot of documentation, but it's just difficult to follow. I swear they're paying technical writers by the number of sections they can chop a give subject into. I was looking into Azure/Business Central documentation a while back and didn't find anything useful even though there's a ton of information there. I had ~10-15 tabs open all roughly referencing different pieces of what I thought I needed. Eventually, I stumbled across a dev blog, not MS, describing almost exactly what I needed, along with some crucial details that I never saw in Microsoft's documentation.