5 ms·
No, they actively lobbied over the years of her reign to preserve their economic benefits. They enjoyed this luxury and made attempts at preserving and expendin
by _alxk 4y ago
No, they actively lobbied over the years of her reign to preserve their economic benefits. They enjoyed this luxury and made attempts at preserving and expending it. Elizabeth was not a passive victim of her birth circumstances.
- noodleman 4y ago>Elizabeth was not a passive victim of her birth circumstances. It's so strange that this even needs to be said out loud. It's not edgy to say that someone born into her position has benefitted from it. For a place that claims to be a meritocracy, the UK has some strangely dissonant beliefs.
- highwaylights 4y agoNot sure who this needed to be said out loud to. It’s not edgy to explain something everyone already knows. The royal family benefits from the taxation of UK citizens. “For a place that claims to be a meritocracy, the UK has some strangely dissonant beliefs” Are you.. States-splaining.. to me right now? “Elizabeth was not a passive victim of her birth circumstances.. the UK has some strangely dissonant beliefs”. I don’t know if you’re from the US or not, but if so this is the most ironically hypocritical thing I’ve ever read.