9 ms·
I don't want that to be a quasi-unilateral judgement. Also, one question. Suppose we do change the laws, and Kiwi Farms continues to operate within those new l
by andywood 4y ago
I don't want that to be a quasi-unilateral judgement.
Also, one question. Suppose we do change the laws, and Kiwi Farms continues to operate within those new laws. Will that be enough, do you think? Because the US would have to outlaw dead naming and misgendering for it to be enough for the activists.
- initplus 4y agoPrivacy protections should apply regardless of whether it's a megacorporation or a disorganized group of independent actors. Most of the individuals targeted by Kiwifarms are not running for office, or own prominent businesses. They are for the most part unemployed nobodies who live at home. I don't see any public interest in naming these people.
- andywood 4y agoStill really unclear what law is being broken in that case. Unless you're proposing new speech-curtailing legislation. They're Intenet-famous. They're of interest to forever-onlines. This one in particular is of interest to women and parents who've so far resisted brainwashing.