5 ms·

Yeah sure you can check out: https://www.runsidekick.com/rookout-comparison https://www.runsidekick.com/rookout-comparison & https://www.runsidekick.com/lightru

Yeah sure you can check out: https://www.runsidekick.com/rookout-comparison https://www.runsidekick.com/rookout-comparison & https://www.runsidekick.com/lightrun-comparison https://www.runsidekick.com/lightrun-comparison We are currently updating these pages but we mainly differ with: Our headless approach (REST API & Node.js client), Lower Overhead & Higher Hit count limits, Web IDE, OSS, Thundra APM integration, Collaboration support, Full On-premise solution with Web IDE support more will come with this months updates

invalidname 4y ago
This isn't a comparison just a title and misleading bullets. Lightrun supports all these things and so much more. * Lightrun supports web UI via VSCode.dev support * Lightrun can be installed on-prem * It supports all these 3 platforms and .net soon * It supports SSO and quite a few features required by fortune 100 companies
- bariskaya 4y ago
  sorry for being misleading, I was not trying to do so. About the first one I was referring to our own web UI, considering the plugins you are right. 2. one they weren't used to ship with a 3rd party IDE afaik, that's why I've said full on-prem with web ui. don't remember saying anything about the 3rd and the 4th, and it wasn't supposed to be something offensive to our competitors
  - invalidname 4y ago
    The site says: > Sidekick vs Lightrun Why Choose Sidekick Which implies the following bullet points are thing that sidekick has and Lightrun doesn't. Number 3 and 4 correspond to: * Comprehensive language coverage (NodeJS, Java, Python) All supported by Lightrun * Enterprise features such as SSO, Workspace management, and more Not sure what workspace management means but Lightrun supports a wide range of enterprise features and is deployed in Fortune 100 and major security conscious enterprises.
bariskaya 4y ago
also you can read our benchmark results: https://medium.com/runsidekick/sidekick-blog-production-debuggers-2022-benchmark-results-part-1-ec173d0f8ccd https://medium.com/runsidekick/sidekick-blog-production-debu...

invalidname 4y ago

This isn't a comparison just a title and misleading bullets. Lightrun supports all these things and so much more. * Lightrun supports web UI via VSCode.dev support * Lightrun can be installed on-prem * It supports all these 3 platforms and .net soon * It supports SSO and quite a few features required by fortune 100 companies

bariskaya 4y ago
sorry for being misleading, I was not trying to do so. About the first one I was referring to our own web UI, considering the plugins you are right. 2. one they weren't used to ship with a 3rd party IDE afaik, that's why I've said full on-prem with web ui. don't remember saying anything about the 3rd and the 4th, and it wasn't supposed to be something offensive to our competitors
- invalidname 4y ago
  The site says: > Sidekick vs Lightrun Why Choose Sidekick Which implies the following bullet points are thing that sidekick has and Lightrun doesn't. Number 3 and 4 correspond to: * Comprehensive language coverage (NodeJS, Java, Python) All supported by Lightrun * Enterprise features such as SSO, Workspace management, and more Not sure what workspace management means but Lightrun supports a wide range of enterprise features and is deployed in Fortune 100 and major security conscious enterprises.

bariskaya 4y ago

also you can read our benchmark results: https://medium.com/runsidekick/sidekick-blog-production-debuggers-2022-benchmark-results-part-1-ec173d0f8ccd https://medium.com/runsidekick/sidekick-blog-production-debu...