11 ms·
I guess the (crazy, I know) assumption that I made is that I have some analytical, symbolic expression for a function that describes the state of the universe a
by kbr- 4y ago
I guess the (crazy, I know) assumption that I made is that I have some analytical, symbolic expression for a function that describes the state of the universe at every point. This "state" describes some fundamental quantity (not necessarily a quantity we have a name for yet).
Then we express the value of any particle field at every point as a (potentially very complex) symbolic expression that only uses the state function from my previous paragraph.
All of these expressions need only finite memory to store. They describe functions with domain R^n to some co-domain of operators or whatever.
Then I can calculate the value of this complex function at any point with any precision I like, with finite memory, although unbounded - I need to allocate more memory when I want more precision.
Point is, I delay the process of "latticization" (calculating the numerical values at each point of a chosen lattice) to the very end - only then I have to choose how fine-grained my lattice is.
- evanb 4y ago> I guess the (crazy, I know) assumption that I made is that I have some analytical, symbolic expression for a function that describes the state of the universe at every point. This is the error. All you have is some partial differential equation. It has no known symbolic solution.