13 ms·
How to lose time and money
- teyc 15y agovery timely advice. I was just thinking about investing a chunk of change. Thanks.
- ericdykstra 15y agoThere's nothing wrong with investing, just investing foolishly.
- teyc 15y agoor being too optimistic, or relying on bad advice.
- ericdykstra 15y agoAre those things not being foolish?
- teyc 15y agoYes. Of course. I happen to prefer more specific descriptions of what may go wrong.
- JoeAltmaier 15y agoBut is it actionable? I have to answer email, sometimes.
- fferen 15y agoI think this ties into the idea of MMORPGs. I used to play them a lot until I realized they were not fun, just addictive; they make you feel like you're accomplishing something by leveling and gaining skills, when really it's only your character that's improving - you're not getting better at anything.
- jdh 15y agoI felt this way a decade ago when my wife and I rented Season 1 of the show 24. I never enjoyed it, but felt strangely compelled to find out what happened in the next episode, and would stay up too late watching. After one season I decided that was enough of that addiction.
- 5hoom 15y agoI really hated the politics and rhetoric of 24, but was somehow compelled beyond my will to watch every single episode. I knew it was unhealthy as I'd stay up way too late and ended up getting weird & anxious (head full of of right-wing fantasy combined with prolonged sleep depravation). Unlike you I didn't kick the addiction & i've now seen every season. Damn you and your insidious cliff-hangers Jack Bauer! :P
- Joakal 15y agoI didn't watch it because it got cliché pretty fast like LOST. The worst offender I reckon was Dragonball Z [0]. I realised this pattern and that greatly put me off many games and movies, eg WoW, FarmVille, etc. It was a grind. I want something novel. [0] Do: Scream, build up tension, to be continued, until Infinity. Replace scream with drama (twists).
- Natsu 15y agoOuch. I watched that back on TV a decade ago when I had no idea what I was getting into. Longest "15 minutes" ever. They're supposed to be fighting on a planet that's about to explode... but the planet patiently waits to blow up until their fight is over... which takes almost forever. Ugh.
- tomjen3 15y agoAlias has the same problem. The best solution I have ever heard is to watch the first few minutes of the next episode to solve the cliffhanger. But excessive cliffhangers are mostly what turned me of Lost.
- Arro 15y agoI think for me this manifests itself in wasting time on reddit and twitter. Whenever I have a blank chrome tab, my unconscious reaction is to punch in one of these time-wasters.
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- gbog 15y agoThis short essay is not pg at his best in my view. Spending time having fun is Plain Good, and necessary, even for the most focused startup founder. But watching TV don't count obviously. Playing cards with friends at a terasse does.
- ddlatham 15y agoThe most dangerous way to lose time is not to spend it having fun, but to spend it doing fake work. His focus is not criticizing having fun, but wasting time without realizing it.
- dkokelley 15y agoThere are many positive activities that can be both productive and fun, including a card game with friends. In that case, you are investing in to those relationships and fulfilling a very basic human desire for socialization. It's not that you're not getting anything done. You're just getting different things done. Compare that to a day in front of the TV. Can you say you've gotten anything out of it? Did you learn anything? Were you able to relieve stress or relax? Perhaps in small quantities TV can provide those benefits, but would trading your entire day be worth it? Now to take your card playing to an extreme, would it be beneficial for someone like the president to spend an entire day playing cards with non-political friends? Sure the president needs a vacation every once in a while, but assume that this is not a vacation day. There are many more important things that should be done, and even with the relaxation and socialization benefits that card playing with friends has, I believe the president's "wasting time" alarm would go off. There are elections to win and speeches to give. But what about spending an entire day reviewing a minor bill? Sure, bills are important. After all, the president should know about what new laws are being considered. Even so, an entire day could go by without the president thinking "this is a waste of time". After all, he's not playing. He's working.
- gbog 15y ago> [playing cards] you are investing in to those relationships and fulfilling a very basic human desire for socialization. I think your point of view, and pg's, is very utilitarian. Utilitarianism has its uses in many human activities, including writing code, but should not be invoked when talking about playing cards with friends. When I play card, I do NOT "invest" in relationships, I have no intent to fulfill anything. I am just having a great time with friends. Playing cards, or fishing, or chatting idly, is just a way to spend time doing nothing. And doing nothing, ie spending time without any "investment intent", is the way to enjoy fully your time. Take another case: if you spend time reading a lengthy novel, say Proust, what is it for? Do you read it because you want to tell your friends you read it? Do you read it because you think it is an "investment", adding up to your knowledge of world literature? Do you read it because you want to learn how to write a novel? Learn about Proust? Understand why so many people admire this book? NONE of these reason is valid. All of them are "intents", "investments". All of them will actually destroy in the egg the only valid outcome of reading this novel, which is pure reading pleasure. (You'll have to pass some barriers to feel this pleasure, in the beginning) The same holds for painting, music, etc. If you go to a Concert hall listening to Mozart or go to the Louvre and take this activity as an investment in your knowledge of art and your ability to talk cleverly about it, you better stay home watch TV. The flip-side of this is that by actually reading lengthy novel, playing cards idly with friends, etc., and doing so without intent, you will in fact learn a lot about life, about humans, and also how to handle relationships. But the "without intent" part is essential. To take your example about the president: I would LOVE the presidents of big or small countries to spend a lot of time doing nothing, chatting with "non-politician" friends, read lengthy novels. They would probably do less mistakes. We live in a world where we are made believe that every second counts, like in TV series. It is not true. The only reason to live on earth is to be happy, happiness is a state of mind that need some idle time to spawn, let's stop running behind our ghost's shade. [Edit: typo, clarity]
- zipdog 15y agoSometimes I think the feeling of getting "basically nothing" done by the end of the day is not the right timeframe - there are projects that have gone on for weeks that ultimately were a complete waste of time. But while working through those projects I felt something productive was happening, which made it difficult to think of them as "basically nothing". I'm not talking about failed ventures that could have turned into something great, these projects were pretty much always going to amount to nothing (they just appeared at the outset to be different to what they were)
- jseliger 15y agoSometimes I think the feeling of getting "basically nothing" done by the end of the day is not the right timeframe - there are projects that have gone on for weeks that ultimately were a complete waste of time. I suspect pg means that he spent the day checking / responding to e-mails, reading HN, maybe paying some bills, noodling around the Internet, checking e-mail again, and then discovering that it's getting close to bed time, rather than working on long-term projects where the work he's doing hasn't immediately borne fruit. The Internet is particularly insidious in this respect, because reading HN, looking at the NYT, and so forth can feel work-like without actually accomplishing anything substantial.
- _delirium 15y agoThe Internet is particularly insidious in this respect, because reading HN, looking at the NYT, and so forth can feel work-like without actually accomplishing anything substantial. It's true, but it also builds vague background knowledge in a hard-to-quantify way (and I'm honestly not sure how it stacks up to the time invested). I very frequently find myself drawing on knowledge that I ran across during internet time-wasting, whether it was a relevant article I found on HN, or a Wikipedia article I found in one of those random-walk-through-link sessions (or the journal articles I found via the Wikipedia articles...). On the other hand, I also spend a lot of time "keeping up with the internet", so it's not free. But it's certainly shown up in papers I've published in my day job. It's an interesting tradeoff; I'd say I'm less concentrated and diligent than most of my colleagues on what I'm "supposed to be doing", but I'm also more broadly aware of what's going on outside of our little academic bubble. They get more done on their main projects, but I'm the person to come to if you want to be pointed to relevant articles/libraries/demos/posts on $topic_foo. It's not even so much that it saves me time researching later, as that I'm not sure I'd even be able to make some of the cross-connections between subjects without this undirected information-gathering.
- revorad 15y agoIf Alanis Morissette read PG's essays on time management and knew he also built HN, she'd probably write more meaningful song lyrics.
- mthreat 15y agoIsn't it ironic...
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- goldmab 15y agoIf Paul Graham realized that people can easily lose lots of money by investing, why did he devote himself to investing large amounts of his own money in high-risk businesses? I'm not being facetious, I just think that seems contradictory. If I had a lot of money and that same knowledge, I would invest very conservatively.
- jodrellblank 15y agoHe sold Viaweb for tens of millions, he invests low tens of thousands. He warns that careless trading may lose money without setting off fear, he invests in companies he also guides them to try and help them succeed. He doesn't invest alone, the risk and decisions have other people he trusts watching or contributing. They turn down most of the applicants
- orky56 15y agoI bet he does a lot more due diligence on his YC investments than in the investments he references in his essay. He not only scopes talent and recognizes talent but also grooms it with his network and mentorship. He actively manages his "investments" to lower risk and increase chances of success.
- feralchimp 15y agoAt a certain level of diligence and diversification, investment is much more like a job than it is like gambling.
- rokhayakebe 15y agoIf people could talk to the managing team of the companies they invest in for just about 3 minutes, it would be a lot less risky and a lot less money would get lost.
- mlinsey 15y agoThe first couple YC batches were small enough that the money invested was probably a very small portion of what PG/Robert/Trevor earned from Viaweb. For later batches, it had become evident that YC's model was promising, and YC also raised money from outside LP's.
- ggwicz 15y ago"People fright at the concept of losing their money, yet they slave away their time without a second thought." -Seneca the Younger, from Letters from a Stoic (highly recommended) I think slaving away doing something you hate is far more harmful than "wasting" time having fun. I get more out of playing hacky sack and/or listening to podcasts than any homework or school work. So, in relation to this article, I think we should maybe consider "losing time" as doing anything that you deeply don't want to do but are doing just to get more money. The relationship between time and money is a fascinating one. Great article PG.
- JabavuAdams 15y ago> I get more out of playing hacky sack and/or listening to podcasts than any homework or school work. Maybe you're studying the wrong thing?
- ggwicz 15y agoI'm in high school. I'm not knocking education, I'm very thankful for it.
- mooism2 15y agoI read the article as complaining that these things felt like work but weren't work, precisely because they weren't generating any money.
- megablast 15y ago>> I get more out of playing hacky sack and/or listening to podcasts than any homework or school work. Do you? How do you know? Certainly it feels more fun, maybe you feel less stressed afterwards, but does this bias your decision making? Certainly in the long term you could be wrong.
- rick888 15y agoI feel this way about working for other people. If I'm going to slave away for 8+ hours/day on something, I would rather have it make me rich than someone else.
- 15y ago
- orky56 15y agoThis is really a question of short-term gain versus long-term gain as well as tasks versus goals. For short-term fulfillment, we can entertain ourselves or keep ourselves occupied in some manner, regardless of whether it's productive. The key is figuring out how it fits into our overall strategy or goals. Is that activity or task contributing to that long-term gain? More importantly, am I actively managing it as opposed to going on blind auto-pilot (e.g. for that investment or project)? There's no substitute for hard work, just as there's no substitute for self-awareness.
- sgarman 15y agoI like this comment more then the article. The terms "waste time" are used but what does that mean? How do you define wasting time? Easy, you measure what you were doing to your long term goals. I't is easy to say that "playing game x" is wasting time, unless your goal is to be the worlds best player. Of course if you set bad long term goals for yourself you maybe always be "wasting time."
- Rinum 15y agoI feel the same way about watching TV all day, except replace TV with reddit x.x
- feralchimp 15y ago"The solution is to develop new alarms." ...and get rid of some other ones.
- gabaix 15y agoOne of my alarms is looking at my long-term objectives and see if my work made me move in the right direction. I have my objectives written down in a prominent place, so I can make sure I stay focused.
- phzbOx 15y agoIf I give you 5M$ now, what would you do? Now, do exactly that, without those 5M$.
- damoncali 15y agoI tried. The credit card company complained.
- johnl 15y agoI always thought that the best way to avoid losing a lot of money is to diversify and avoid leverage. Derivatives is leverage big time, it's speculation, not investing, you can lose much more than you invested. Diversify and avoiding leverage as a VC would be to invest a relatively small amount of money over many potential companies. So can avoiding leverage to conserve your investments work the same way with time? Leverage as a small company might be like sub'ing out your work to others. I've never read anything positive with that approach. How about at the personal level of the article - some wasteful activities can be avoided but stuff like email is not going away. So leverage this down time by multitasking. It would take me 4 hours of planning for 2 hour of programming. While I wade thought these emails I am also going to think about, plan, research, and write down what my 2 hours of programming is going to be. During these non productive downtimes, I can get really boring jobs done, the time passes quicker, and I have a head start when my productive time starts.
- aclements18 15y agoI think a good simple way to determine whether I'm doing fake work or not is to ask myself two questions, "Is this challenging?" then "will this help me reach my goals?" I find that if I say no to either then I'm probably doing fake work (or doing real work poorly).
- derpapst 15y agoThat's why my wife and I abandoned TV long time ago. First week was hard, but after that we have always been happy with how we spend our time.
- Andi 15y agoThis is a very important article. Today, many people don't know anymore what well-spent time is. Distractions are everywhere around us ... but if you overcome them you are probably still on the wrong path. Everybody gets in this trap. One must learn and try to get out. Often, a conservative view combined with a high degree of openness is the only way to survive in this jungle of attention and still leave a trace in the dynamic space of tech.
- Andi 15y agoPS: I have never played MMORPGs. Did I miss anything?
- Evernoob 15y agoThe social aspect and the feeling of being in a living and breathing fantasy world is quite intoxicating at first. I do agree that you need to be mindful of the fact that it is just a game and should be played for fun. It is not an achievement and is not helping to further your life any more than any other form of entertainment. It can be very easy to sink a lot of time into those things, but they are fun while they last.
- antirez 15y agoDealing with a shitload of emails is even considered to be the only social acceptable way to work in IT, so that losing time is now institutional. Rebel.
- losethos 15y agoReality is broken--I'm a lab rat. The normal rules don't apply. Everything is pointless. I'm working on dispelling the notion I can change it and get used to nothing.