6 ms·
Your reply strikes me as snarky and rude. You could have phrased your comment differently, and made the exact same point, but without being disrespectful to eve
by SkittyDog 4y ago
Your reply strikes me as snarky and rude. You could have phrased your comment differently, and made the exact same point, but without being disrespectful to everyone who has to read your reply.
* https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
Under "In Comments"...
> Be kind. Don't be snarky. Have curious conversation; don't cross-examine. Please don't fulminate. Please don't sneer, including at the rest of the community.
...
> Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith.
...
> Please don't post shallow dismissals...
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- nativespecies 4y agoYou're really invoking the code of conduct for this completely benign reply? Get over yourself.
- sophacles 4y agoPlease reconsider your interpretation of what I said: * the strongest plausible interpretation is that I re-framed the part of the post I was responding to into the viewpoint of an event organizer before the outcome of said event was known. I think "being rude and shallowly dismissing it" is not the strongest plausible interpretation, but rather a shallow dismissal of my comment. * I believe you are not assuming good faith in my statement. * how is it snarky? * how is it rude? I have no idea how it could be plausibly have been interpreted as disrespectful to anyone merely reading the exchange - would you mind enlightening me on how I insulted you?