7 ms·

It's been a while since I've been in the hardware-level IT side of things, but is it not unwise to run a production server with SanDisk drives?

deleted 4y ago
[deleted]
batmansmom1 4y ago
What is the industry standard for this?
- walrus01 4y ago
  samsung or intel would be strongly preferable in my opinion
  - iszomer 4y ago
    Not so. Intel is the highest rated for failure from a QC point of view. We've been having a rash of such problems with our last batch that it's making everyone in our department nervous before shipment.
    - walrus01 4y ago
      It is always sad when a previously highly rated manufacturer turns to crap. Intel was an extremely solid option back in the earliest days of SSDs.
- cjensen 4y ago
  For an SSD, you need to buy "Enterprise" or "Data Center" class drives for this kind of application. That class of drive have higher write endurance which is important since enterprise applications can have orders of magnitude more writes to their drives than a typical desktop. That said, there's no real standard blanket vendor recommendation so long as the "Enterprise" criteria is met.
  - goatcode 4y ago
    Do SanDisk sell enterprise / data center class drives?
- goatcode 4y ago
  No idea now. I usually look to BackBlaze's periodic drive performance reports when I'm shopping, but even that's been a while for me.
  - walrus01 4y ago
    at a large enough scale, almost everything backblaze uses is sufficiently reliable as measured by percentage of any pool of 100 drives that fails in a year, as they have a large amount of parity / data duplication across multiple pods, hot spares, etc. I haven't seen any drives that really stood out as terrible in their reports in the last couple of years for 12TB+ spinning disks, although the HGST product do seem to be the most reliable.
    - goatcode 4y ago
      The manufacturers whose drives they use provide a good basis for my consideration. I don't see certain names on their lists sometimes, so my search usually is narrowed down by that.
      - walrus01 4y ago
        there's literally only 3 spinning HDD manufacturers on earth now so if a name doesn't appear on their list now it's because it doesn't exist. some of the things on their list are now brands owned by a single company through consolidation.
        goatcode 4y ago
        They now have a SSD report: https://www.backblaze.com/blog/ssd-edition-2021-drive-stats-review/ https://www.backblaze.com/blog/ssd-edition-2021-drive-stats-...
NavinF 4y ago
> been a while since I've been in the hardware-level Well yeah that’s probably why you see “SanDisk” and think of consumer SD cards.
- goatcode 4y ago
  I'd imagine. Do they make stuff now that's intended to be spec'd for enterprise servers?

deleted 4y ago

[deleted]

batmansmom1 4y ago

What is the industry standard for this?

walrus01 4y ago
samsung or intel would be strongly preferable in my opinion
- iszomer 4y ago
  Not so. Intel is the highest rated for failure from a QC point of view. We've been having a rash of such problems with our last batch that it's making everyone in our department nervous before shipment.
  - walrus01 4y ago
    It is always sad when a previously highly rated manufacturer turns to crap. Intel was an extremely solid option back in the earliest days of SSDs.
cjensen 4y ago
For an SSD, you need to buy "Enterprise" or "Data Center" class drives for this kind of application. That class of drive have higher write endurance which is important since enterprise applications can have orders of magnitude more writes to their drives than a typical desktop. That said, there's no real standard blanket vendor recommendation so long as the "Enterprise" criteria is met.
- goatcode 4y ago
  Do SanDisk sell enterprise / data center class drives?
goatcode 4y ago
No idea now. I usually look to BackBlaze's periodic drive performance reports when I'm shopping, but even that's been a while for me.
- walrus01 4y ago
  at a large enough scale, almost everything backblaze uses is sufficiently reliable as measured by percentage of any pool of 100 drives that fails in a year, as they have a large amount of parity / data duplication across multiple pods, hot spares, etc. I haven't seen any drives that really stood out as terrible in their reports in the last couple of years for 12TB+ spinning disks, although the HGST product do seem to be the most reliable.
  - goatcode 4y ago
    The manufacturers whose drives they use provide a good basis for my consideration. I don't see certain names on their lists sometimes, so my search usually is narrowed down by that.
    - walrus01 4y ago
      there's literally only 3 spinning HDD manufacturers on earth now so if a name doesn't appear on their list now it's because it doesn't exist. some of the things on their list are now brands owned by a single company through consolidation.
      - goatcode 4y ago
        They now have a SSD report: https://www.backblaze.com/blog/ssd-edition-2021-drive-stats-review/ https://www.backblaze.com/blog/ssd-edition-2021-drive-stats-...

NavinF 4y ago

> been a while since I've been in the hardware-level Well yeah that’s probably why you see “SanDisk” and think of consumer SD cards.

goatcode 4y ago
I'd imagine. Do they make stuff now that's intended to be spec'd for enterprise servers?