6 ms·

The comment reads like you used JavaScript 10 years ago. For instance, just use arrow functions and this remains untouched.

• labrador 4y ago
  I know but that's just bizarre. One function has it's own this and another doesn't so if my arrow function gets big and I want to make it a regular function I may have to rewrite it. Ugh. Edit: I'm thinking of cognitive load too. I like to eliminate load I don't need. Keeping track of this is not something I want to do with my life https://drpicox.medium.com/reducing-programmers-cognitive-overload-e14df3b73432 https://drpicox.medium.com/reducing-programmers-cognitive-ov...
  • chmod775 4y ago
    > so if my arrow function gets big and I want to make it a regular function I may have to rewrite it. There's absolutely no reason to make an arrow function a regular function just because it goes past a certain number of lines. It really seems like you should become more familiar before forming an opinion. There's valid criticism to be made, but those aren't it.
    • labrador 4y ago
      I sometimes refactor code for purely aesthetic reasons. To each his own. http://www.synergeticapplications.com/ergonomics.htm http://www.synergeticapplications.com/ergonomics.htm By the way, I feel like I'm at a bar and you're negging me
• arcosdev 4y ago
  or, better yet, stop using this