6 ms·
His point was going after newer and smaller companies is a joke when larger companies are basically getting away with murder, or more accurately doing nearly th
by ArrayBoundCheck 4y ago
His point was going after newer and smaller companies is a joke when larger companies are basically getting away with murder, or more accurately doing nearly the same thing you're punishing smaller companies for doing (at a larger scale)
- melenaboija 4y agoI still don’t understand the reasoning. The way to follow the rules is looking who is doing worst and take that as an upper bound?
- ArrayBoundCheck 4y agoMore like it's pointless to say you can't do X behavior but someone else can You mostly need to outlaw all of it or someone will keep doing it. Going after smaller companies won't change anything
- JumpCrisscross 4y ago> don’t understand the reasoning Prioritising limited enforcement resources based on harm minimisation.
- melenaboija 4y agoAs a citizen of a democratic country I still prefer the laws dictating what is harmful rather than a CEO and a member of the government unilaterally. And if something goes wrong use the tools from a democratic regime to change it. Even with its drawbacks democracies are the best system known to rule countries.