8 ms·
> Fundraising to improve the place and reduce burdens on residents dealing with but not profiting from tourism seems smart. That's absolutely fine, but I feel
by Spinosaurus 4y ago
> Fundraising to improve the place and reduce burdens on residents dealing with but not profiting from tourism seems smart.
That's absolutely fine, but I feel like a reservation/ticketing system such as the one proposed is not the best solution. Again, a tourism tax across the city might achieve the same effect without such a system.
In my opinion, the cost (within reason) is absolutely irrelevant. Raising money for the city and locals is a great effort and I applaud it. It is simply the requirement of yet another "hoop to jump through" that bothers me. After years of a pandemic with legally questionable restrictions and requirements throughout daily life, I simply don't want more "hoops to jump through".
- FalconSensei 4y agoYou can also visit any other tourist destination you want, without that extra hoop, including places in Italy