9 ms·
KarmaCall was built on nano and so was FynCom. Building apps without tokens removes the speculation [ and the volume of activity associated with it :( ] and let
by AdrianEGraphene 4y ago
KarmaCall was built on nano and so was FynCom. Building apps without tokens removes the speculation [ and the volume of activity associated with it :( ] and lets you focus on your core business models.
At a recent online event, I was asked to talk "what is the riskiest thing about building on crypto". The answer I gave was "it can distract you from your core business model, from making your customers happy".
EDIT: I echo your sentiment though. I wrote something supporting your thoughts (I think?) a while ago. Do you think this is a similar sentiment? [1]
[1] https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/using-crypto-tool-investment-adrian-e-garcia/ https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/using-crypto-tool-investment-...
- harwoodleon 4y agoTotally agree. I am considering this exact point in a business decision. It comes down to the use of the token. If the token is being used to capitalise the business activity then it is better to be a mature and compliant financial instrument, rather than a roll your own token. It is a tough decision though.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]